Reproducibility in the absence of selective reporting: An illustration from large‐scale brain asymmetry research
Human Brain Mapping. 2020-08-25; 43(1): 244-254
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25154
Read on PubMed
Kong XZ(1)(2); ENIGMA Laterality Working Group; Francks C(1)(3).
Collaborators: Kong XZ, Mathias SR, Guadalupe T, Abé C, Agartz I, Akudjedu TN,
Aleman A, Alhusaini S, Allen NB, Ames D, Andreassen OA, Vasquez AA, Armstrong
NJ, Asherson P, Bergo F, Bastin ME, Batalla A, Bauer J, Baune BT, Baur-Streubel
R, Biederman J, Blaine SK, Boedhoe P, Bøen E, Bose A, Bralten J, Brandeis D,
Brem S, Brodaty H, Yüksel D, Brooks SJ, Buitelaar J, Bürger C, Bülow R, Calhoun
V, Calvo A, Canales-Rodríguez EJ, Cannon DM, Caparelli EC, Castellanos FX,
Cendes F, Chaim-Avancini TM, Chantiluke K, Chen QL, Chen X, Cheng Y, Christakou
A, Clark VP, Coghill D, Connolly CG, Conzelmann A, Córdova-Palomera A, Cousijn
J, Crow T, Cubillo A, Dannlowski U, de Bruttopilo SA, de Zeeuw P, Deary IJ,
Demeter DV, Di Martino A, Dickie EW, Dietsche B, Doan NT, Doherty CP, Doyle A,
Durston S, Earl E, Ehrlich S, Ekman CJ, Elvsåshagen T, Epstein JN, Fair DA,
Faraone SV, Fernández G, Flint C, Filho GB, Förster K, Fouche JP, Foxe JJ, Frodl
T, Fuentes-Claramonte P, Fullerton JM, Garavan H, do Santos Garcia D, Gotlib IH,
Goudriaan AE, Grabe HJ, Groenewold NA, Grotegerd D, Gruber O, Gurholt T, Haavik
J, Hahn T, Hansell NK, Harris MA, Hartman CA, Del Carmen Valdés Hernández M,
Heslenfeld D, Hester R, Hibar DP, Ho BC, Ho TC, Hoekstra PJ, van Holst RJ,
Hoogman M, Høvik MF, Howells FM, Hugdahl K, Huyser C, Ingvar M, Ishikawa A,
James A, Jahanshad N, Jernigan TL, Jönsson EG, Kaleda V, Kelly C, Kerich M,
Keshavan MS, Khadka S, Kircher T, Kohls G, Konrad K, Korucuoglu O, Krämer B,
Krug A, Kuntsi J, Kwon JS, Lambregts-Rommelse N, Landén M, Lázaro L, Lebedeva I,
Lenroot R, Lesch KP, Li Q, Lim KO, Liu J, Lochner C, London ED, Lorenzetti V,
Luciano M, Luijten M, Lundervold AJ, Mackey S, MacMaster FP, Maingault S, Malpas
CB, Malt UF, Mataix-Cols D, Martin-Santos R, Mayer AR, McCarthy H, Medland S,
Metha M, Mitchell PB, Mueller BA, Maniega SM, Mazoyer B, McDonald C, McLellan Q,
McMahon KL, McPhilemy G, Momenan R, Morales AM, Narayanaswamy JC, Moreira JCV,
Nerland S, Nestor L, Newman E, Nigg JT, Nordvik JE, Novotny S, Weiss EO,
O’Gorman RL, Oosterlaan J, Oranje B, Orr C, Overs B, Paloyelis Y, Pauli P,
Paulus M, Plessen KJ, von Polier GG, Pomarol-Clotet E, Portella MJ, Qiu J, Radua
J, Ramos-Quiroga JA, Reddy YCJ, Reif A, Roberts G, Rosa P, Rubia K, Sacchet MD,
Sachdev PS, Salvador R, Schmaal L, Schulte-Rüther M, Schweren L, Seitz J, Serpa
MH, Shaw P, Shumskaya E, Silk TJ, Simmons AN, Simulionyte E, Sinha R, Sjoerds Z,
Smelror RE, Soliva JC, Solowij N, Souza-Duran FL, Sponheim SR, Stein DJ, Stein
EA, Stevens M, Strike LT, Sudre G, Sui J, Tamm L, Temmingh HS, Thoma RJ,
Tomyshev A, Tronchin G, Turner J, Uhlmann A, van Erp TGM, van den Heuvel OA, van
der Meer D, van Eijk L, Vance A, Veer IM, Veltman DJ, Venkatasubramanian G,
Vilarroya O, Vives-Gilabert Y, Voineskos AN, Völzke H, Vuletic D, Walitza S,
Walter H, Walton E, Wardlaw JM, Wen W, Westlye LT, Whelan CD, White T, Wiers RW,
Wright MJ, Wittfeld K, Yang TT, Yasuda CL, Yoncheva Y, Yücel M, Yun JY, Zanetti
MV, Zhen Z, Zhu XX, Ziegler GC, de Zubicaray GI, Zwiers M, Project KS, Glahn DC,
Crivello F, Fisher SE, Thompson PM, Francks C, Farde L, Flyckt L, Engberg G,
Erhardt S, Fatouros-Bergman H, Cervenka S, Schwieler L, Piehl F, Agartz I,
Collste K, Victorsson P, Malmqvist A, Hedberg M, Orhan F, Sellgren C.
Author information:
(1)Language and Genetics Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics,
Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
(2)Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou, China.
(3)Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University,
Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
The problem of poor reproducibility of scientific findings has received much
attention over recent years, in a variety of fields including psychology and
neuroscience. The problem has been partly attributed to publication bias and
unwanted practices such as p-hacking. Low statistical power in individual
studies is also understood to be an important factor. In a recent multisite
collaborative study, we mapped brain anatomical left-right asymmetries for
regional measures of surface area and cortical thickness, in 99 MRI datasets
from around the world, for a total of over 17,000 participants. In the present
study, we revisited these hemispheric effects from the perspective of
reproducibility. Within each dataset, we considered that an effect had been
reproduced when it matched the meta-analytic effect from the 98 other datasets,
in terms of effect direction and significance threshold. In this sense, the
results within each dataset were viewed as coming from separate studies in an
“ideal publishing environment,” that is, free from selective reporting and p
hacking. We found an average reproducibility rate of 63.2% (SD = 22.9%,
min = 22.2%, max = 97.0%). As expected, reproducibility was higher for larger
effects and in larger datasets. Reproducibility was not obviously related to the
age of participants, scanner field strength, FreeSurfer software version,
cortical regional measurement reliability, or regional size. These findings
constitute an empirical illustration of reproducibility in the absence of
publication bias or p hacking, when assessing realistic biological effects in
heterogeneous neuroscience data, and given typically-used sample sizes.
© 2020 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.